Acquisition Process

✓ LOW ✓ MODERATE ✓ HIGH
11 Enhancements 1 Overlay 13 Related Controls
Graph
Export ▾

Requirements NIST SOURCE

Include the following requirements, descriptions, and criteria, explicitly or by reference, using [one of: standardized contract language; ] in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service:

Discussion (NIST Supplemental Guidance)

Security and privacy functional requirements are typically derived from the high-level security and privacy requirements described in SA-2 . The derived requirements include security and privacy capabilities, functions, and mechanisms. Strength requirements associated with such capabilities, functions, and mechanisms include degree of correctness, completeness, resistance to tampering or bypass, and resistance to direct attack. Assurance requirements include development processes, procedures, and methodologies as well as the evidence from development and assessment activities that provide grounds for confidence that the required functionality is implemented and possesses the required strength of mechanism. SP 800-160-1 describes the process of requirements engineering as part of the system development life cycle. Controls can be viewed as descriptions of the safeguards and protection capabilities appropriate for achieving the particular security and privacy objectives of the organization and for reflecting the security and privacy requirements of stakeholders. Controls are selected and implemented in order to satisfy system requirements and include developer and organizational responsibilities. Controls can include technical, administrative, and physical aspects. In some cases, the selection and implementation of a control may necessitate additional specification by the organization in the form of derived requirements or instantiated control parameter values. The derived requirements and control parameter values may be necessary to provide the appropriate level of implementation detail for controls within the system development life cycle. Security and privacy documentation requirements address all stages of the system development life cycle. Documentation provides user and administrator guidance for the implementation and operation of controls. The level of detail required in such documentation is based on the security categorization or classification level of the system and the degree to which organizations depend on the capabilities, functions, or mechanisms to meet risk response expectations. Requirements can include mandated configuration settings that specify allowed functions, ports, protocols, and services. Acceptance criteria for systems, system components, and system services are defined in the same manner as the criteria for any organizational acquisition or procurement. Organizations can determine other requirements that support security and operations, to include responsibilities for the organization and developer, and notification and timing requirements for support, maintenance and updates.

Enhancements NIST SOURCE

SA-4(1) Functional Properties of Controls LOW ✓ MODERATE ✓ HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to provide a description of the functional properties of the controls to be implemented.

Discussion

Functional properties of security and privacy controls describe the functionality (i.e., security or privacy capability, functions, or mechanisms) visible at the interfaces of the controls and specifically exclude functionality and data structures internal to the operation of the controls.

Open full page for SA-4(1) →
SA-4(2) Design and Implementation Information for Controls LOW ✓ MODERATE ✓ HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to provide design and implementation information for the controls that includes: [one of: security-relevant external system interfaces; high-level design; low-level design; source code or hardware schematics; ] at [level of detail].

Discussion

Organizations may require different levels of detail in the documentation for the design and implementation of controls in organizational systems, system components, or system services based on mission and business requirements, requirements for resiliency and trustworthiness, and requirements for analysis and testing. Systems can be partitioned into multiple subsystems. Each subsystem within the system can contain one or more modules. The high-level design for the system is expressed in terms of subsystems and the interfaces between subsystems providing security-relevant functionality. The low-level design for the system is expressed in terms of modules and the interfaces between modules providing security-relevant functionality. Design and implementation documentation can include manufacturer, version, serial number, verification hash signature, software libraries used, date of purchase or download, and the vendor or download source. Source code and hardware schematics are referred to as the implementation representation of the system.

Open full page for SA-4(2) →
SA-4(3) Development Methods, Techniques, and Practices LOW MODERATE HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to demonstrate the use of a system development life cycle process that includes:

  1. (a) [systems engineering methods];
  2. (b) [one of: ; ] ; and
  3. (c) [one of: ; ; ].
Discussion

Following a system development life cycle that includes state-of-the-practice software development methods, systems engineering methods, systems security and privacy engineering methods, and quality control processes helps to reduce the number and severity of latent errors within systems, system components, and system services. Reducing the number and severity of such errors reduces the number of vulnerabilities in those systems, components, and services. Transparency in the methods and techniques that developers select and implement for systems engineering, systems security and privacy engineering, software development, component and system assessments, and quality control processes provides an increased level of assurance in the trustworthiness of the system, system component, or system service being acquired.

Open full page for SA-4(3) →
SA-4(4) Assignment of Components to Systems WITHDRAWN

Withdrawn. Incorporated into CM-8(9).

SA-4(5) System, Component, and Service Configurations LOW MODERATE ✓ HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to:

  1. (a) Deliver the system, component, or service with [security configurations] implemented; and
  2. (b) Use the configurations as the default for any subsequent system, component, or service reinstallation or upgrade.
Discussion

Examples of security configurations include the U.S. Government Configuration Baseline (USGCB), Security Technical Implementation Guides (STIGs), and any limitations on functions, ports, protocols, and services. Security characteristics can include requiring that default passwords have been changed.

Open full page for SA-4(5) →
SA-4(6) Use of Information Assurance Products LOW MODERATE HIGH
  1. (a) Employ only government off-the-shelf or commercial off-the-shelf information assurance and information assurance-enabled information technology products that compose an NSA-approved solution to protect classified information when the networks used to transmit the information are at a lower classification level than the information being transmitted; and
  2. (b) Ensure that these products have been evaluated and/or validated by NSA or in accordance with NSA-approved procedures.
Discussion

Commercial off-the-shelf IA or IA-enabled information technology products used to protect classified information by cryptographic means may be required to use NSA-approved key management. See NSA CSFC.

Open full page for SA-4(6) →
SA-4(7) NIAP-approved Protection Profiles LOW MODERATE HIGH
  1. (a) Limit the use of commercially provided information assurance and information assurance-enabled information technology products to those products that have been successfully evaluated against a National Information Assurance partnership (NIAP)-approved Protection Profile for a specific technology type, if such a profile exists; and
  2. (b) Require, if no NIAP-approved Protection Profile exists for a specific technology type but a commercially provided information technology product relies on cryptographic functionality to enforce its security policy, that the cryptographic module is FIPS-validated or NSA-approved.
Discussion

See NIAP CCEVS for additional information on NIAP. See NIST CMVP for additional information on FIPS-validated cryptographic modules.

Open full page for SA-4(7) →
SA-4(8) Continuous Monitoring Plan for Controls LOW MODERATE HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to produce a plan for continuous monitoring of control effectiveness that is consistent with the continuous monitoring program of the organization.

Discussion

The objective of continuous monitoring plans is to determine if the planned, required, and deployed controls within the system, system component, or system service continue to be effective over time based on the inevitable changes that occur. Developer continuous monitoring plans include a sufficient level of detail such that the information can be incorporated into continuous monitoring programs implemented by organizations. Continuous monitoring plans can include the types of control assessment and monitoring activities planned, frequency of control monitoring, and actions to be taken when controls fail or become ineffective.

Open full page for SA-4(8) →
SA-4(9) Functions, Ports, Protocols, and Services in Use LOW ✓ MODERATE ✓ HIGH

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to identify the functions, ports, protocols, and services intended for organizational use.

Discussion

The identification of functions, ports, protocols, and services early in the system development life cycle (e.g., during the initial requirements definition and design stages) allows organizations to influence the design of the system, system component, or system service. This early involvement in the system development life cycle helps organizations avoid or minimize the use of functions, ports, protocols, or services that pose unnecessarily high risks and understand the trade-offs involved in blocking specific ports, protocols, or services or requiring system service providers to do so. Early identification of functions, ports, protocols, and services avoids costly retrofitting of controls after the system, component, or system service has been implemented. SA-9 describes the requirements for external system services. Organizations identify which functions, ports, protocols, and services are provided from external sources.

Open full page for SA-4(9) →
SA-4(10) Use of Approved PIV Products ✓ LOW ✓ MODERATE ✓ HIGH

Employ only information technology products on the FIPS 201-approved products list for Personal Identity Verification (PIV) capability implemented within organizational systems.

Discussion

Products on the FIPS 201-approved products list meet NIST requirements for Personal Identity Verification (PIV) of Federal Employees and Contractors. PIV cards are used for multi-factor authentication in systems and organizations.

Open full page for SA-4(10) →
SA-4(11) System of Records LOW MODERATE HIGH

Include [Privacy Act requirements] in the acquisition contract for the operation of a system of records on behalf of an organization to accomplish an organizational mission or function.

Discussion

When, by contract, an organization provides for the operation of a system of records to accomplish an organizational mission or function, the organization, consistent with its authority, causes the requirements of the PRIVACT to be applied to the system of records.

Open full page for SA-4(11) →
SA-4(12) Data Ownership LOW MODERATE HIGH
  1. (a) Include organizational data ownership requirements in the acquisition contract; and
  2. (b) Require all data to be removed from the contractor’s system and returned to the organization within [time frame].
Discussion

Contractors who operate a system that contains data owned by an organization initiating the contract have policies and procedures in place to remove the data from their systems and/or return the data in a time frame defined by the contract.

Open full page for SA-4(12) →

Implementation Guidance

Engineering Interpretation

Original engineering commentary written for this explorer — not NIST source text and not authoritative guidance.

No engineering interpretation has been authored for SA-4 yet. This section is architected to receive it — see the Requirements and Assessment sections above for the authoritative NIST source content in the meantime.

Assessment

NIST SP 800-53A REV 5.2.0

Assessment Objectives

  1. one or more of the following PARAMETER VALUES is/are selected: {standardized contract language; <SA-04_ODP[02] contract language>};
  2. contract language is defined (if selected);
  3. security functional requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  4. privacy functional requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  5. strength of mechanism requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  6. security assurance requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  7. privacy assurance requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  8. controls needed to satisfy the security requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  9. controls needed to satisfy the privacy requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  10. security documentation requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  11. privacy documentation requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  12. requirements for protecting security documentation, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  13. requirements for protecting privacy documentation, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  14. the description of the system development environment and environment in which the system is intended to operate, requirements, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  15. the allocation of responsibility or identification of parties responsible for information security requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service;
  16. the allocation of responsibility or identification of parties responsible for privacy requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES>;
  17. the allocation of responsibility or identification of parties responsible for supply chain risk management requirements, descriptions, and criteria are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES>;
  18. acceptance criteria requirements and descriptions are included explicitly or by reference using <SA-04_ODP[01] SELECTED PARAMETER VALUES> in the acquisition contract for the system, system component, or system service.

Examine

[SELECT FROM: System and services acquisition policy; system and services acquisition procedures; procedures addressing the integration of information security and privacy and supply chain risk management into the acquisition process; configuration management plan; acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service; system design documentation; system security plan; supply chain risk management plan; privacy plan; other relevant documents or records].

Interview

[SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with acquisition/contracting responsibilities; organizational personnel with information security and privacy responsibilities; system/network administrators; organizational personnel with supply chain risk management responsibilities].

Test

[SELECT FROM: Organizational processes for determining system security and privacy functional, strength, and assurance requirements; organizational processes for developing acquisition contracts; mechanisms supporting and/or implementing acquisitions and the inclusion of security and privacy requirements in contracts].

Overlays

OT/ICS Overlay SP 800-82r3

NIST SP 800-82r3 Appendix F, Table 22. Blank baseline means the control/control enhancement is not selected in that initial OT baseline.

LOW

  • Base control: Included (matches standard baseline)
  • Included: (10)
  • Added: (12)

MODERATE

  • Base control: Included (matches standard baseline)
  • Included: (1) (2) (9) (10)
  • Added: (12)

HIGH

  • Base control: Included (matches standard baseline)
  • Included: (1) (2) (5) (9) (10)
  • Added: (12)

STIGs & CCIs

No STIG checks or CCI mappings are currently loaded for SA-4. This section is architected to display, per product: STIG ID, Finding ID, Severity, Title, Description, Check, Fix, CCI, and NIST control mapping — but nothing is populated here until a real DISA STIG/CCI dataset is ingested.

Learn more about STIG/CCI integration →

Evidence

Potential Evidence — Derived

Categorized from the SP 800-53A "Examine"/"Test" artifact list above by keyword — not an authoritative NIST evidence list.

Policy

  • System and services acquisition policy
  • system security plan
  • supply chain risk management plan
  • privacy plan

Configuration

  • configuration management plan
  • system design documentation

Testing

  • Organizational processes for determining system security and privacy functional, strength, and assurance requirements
  • organizational processes for developing acquisition contracts
  • mechanisms supporting and/or implementing acquisitions and the inclusion of security and privacy requirements in contracts

Other Records

  • system and services acquisition procedures
  • procedures addressing the integration of information security and privacy and supply chain risk management into the acquisition process
  • acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service
  • other relevant documents or records