Informal Correspondence
LOW MODERATE HIGHRequirements NIST SOURCE
Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to:
Requirement Context
This element is part of SA-17(4) — Informal Correspondence. See the Assessment section below for the related SP 800-53A examine/interview/test procedures. No engineering interpretation has been authored for this control yet.
Requirement Context
This element is part of SA-17(4) — Informal Correspondence. See the Assessment section below for the related SP 800-53A examine/interview/test procedures. No engineering interpretation has been authored for this control yet.
Requirement Context
This element is part of SA-17(4) — Informal Correspondence. See the Assessment section below for the related SP 800-53A examine/interview/test procedures. No engineering interpretation has been authored for this control yet.
Requirement Context
This element is part of SA-17(4) — Informal Correspondence. See the Assessment section below for the related SP 800-53A examine/interview/test procedures. No engineering interpretation has been authored for this control yet.
Requirement Context
This element is part of SA-17(4) — Informal Correspondence. See the Assessment section below for the related SP 800-53A examine/interview/test procedures. No engineering interpretation has been authored for this control yet.
Discussion (NIST Supplemental Guidance)
Correspondence is an important part of the assurance gained through modeling. It demonstrates that the implementation is an accurate transformation of the model, and that additional code or implementation detail has no impact on the behaviors or policies being modeled. Consistency between the descriptive top-level specification (i.e., high-level/low-level design) and the formal policy model is generally not amenable to being fully proven. Therefore, a combination of formal and informal methods may be needed to show such consistency. Hardware, software, and firmware mechanisms strictly internal to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware include mapping registers and direct memory input and output.
Implementation Guidance
Original engineering commentary written for this explorer — not NIST source text and not authoritative guidance.
No engineering interpretation has been authored for SA-17(4) yet. This section is architected to receive it — see the Requirements and Assessment sections above for the authoritative NIST source content in the meantime.
Assessment
Assessment Objectives
- one of the following PARAMETER VALUES is selected: {informal demonstration, convincing argument with formal methods as feasible};
- as an integral part of the development process, the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to produce an informal, descriptive top-level specification that specifies the interfaces to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware in terms of exceptions;
- as an integral part of the development process, the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to produce an informal, descriptive top-level specification that specifies the interfaces to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware in terms of error messages;
- as an integral part of the development process, the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to produce an informal, descriptive top-level specification that specifies the interfaces to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware in terms of effects;
- the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to show via <SA-17(04)_ODP SELECTED PARAMETER VALUE> that the descriptive top-level specification is consistent with the formal policy model;
- the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to show via informal demonstration that the descriptive top-level specification completely covers the interfaces to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware;
- the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to show that the descriptive top-level specification is an accurate description of the interfaces to security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware;
- the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to describe the security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware mechanisms that are not addressed in the descriptive top-level specification but are strictly internal to the security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware.
Examine
[SELECT FROM: System and services acquisition policy; enterprise architecture policy; formal policy model; procedures addressing developer security architecture and design specifications for the system; solicitation documentation; acquisition documentation; service level agreements; acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service; informal, descriptive top-level specification documentation; system security architecture and design documentation; system design documentation; system configuration settings and associated documentation; documentation describing security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware mechanisms not addressed in the informal, descriptive top-level specification documentation; system security plan; other relevant documents or records].
Interview
[SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with system and service acquisition responsibilities; organizational personnel with information security responsibilities; system developer; organizational personnel with information security architecture and design responsibilities].
Overlays
STIGs & CCIs
No STIG checks or CCI mappings are currently loaded for SA-17(4). This section is architected to display, per product: STIG ID, Finding ID, Severity, Title, Description, Check, Fix, CCI, and NIST control mapping — but nothing is populated here until a real DISA STIG/CCI dataset is ingested.
Learn more about STIG/CCI integration →Evidence
Categorized from the SP 800-53A "Examine"/"Test" artifact list above by keyword — not an authoritative NIST evidence list.
Policy
- System and services acquisition policy
- formal policy model
- system security plan
Configuration
- enterprise architecture policy
- procedures addressing developer security architecture and design specifications for the system
- system security architecture and design documentation
- system design documentation
- system configuration settings and associated documentation
Other Records
- solicitation documentation
- acquisition documentation
- service level agreements
- acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service
- informal, descriptive top-level specification documentation
- documentation describing security-relevant hardware, software, and firmware mechanisms not addressed in the informal, descriptive top-level specification documentation
- other relevant documents or records