← SA-11

Static Code Analysis

LOW MODERATE HIGH
1 Overlay 0 Related Controls
Graph
Export ▾

Requirements NIST SOURCE

Require the developer of the system, system component, or system service to employ static code analysis tools to identify common flaws and document the results of the analysis.

Discussion (NIST Supplemental Guidance)

Static code analysis provides a technology and methodology for security reviews and includes checking for weaknesses in the code as well as for the incorporation of libraries or other included code with known vulnerabilities or that are out-of-date and not supported. Static code analysis can be used to identify vulnerabilities and enforce secure coding practices. It is most effective when used early in the development process, when each code change can automatically be scanned for potential weaknesses. Static code analysis can provide clear remediation guidance and identify defects for developers to fix. Evidence of the correct implementation of static analysis can include aggregate defect density for critical defect types, evidence that defects were inspected by developers or security professionals, and evidence that defects were remediated. A high density of ignored findings, commonly referred to as false positives, indicates a potential problem with the analysis process or the analysis tool. In such cases, organizations weigh the validity of the evidence against evidence from other sources.

Implementation Guidance

Engineering Interpretation

Original engineering commentary written for this explorer — not NIST source text and not authoritative guidance.

No engineering interpretation has been authored for SA-11(1) yet. This section is architected to receive it — see the Requirements and Assessment sections above for the authoritative NIST source content in the meantime.

Assessment

NIST SP 800-53A REV 5.2.0

Assessment Objectives

  1. the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to employ static code analysis tools to identify common flaws;
  2. the developer of the system, system component, or system service is required to employ static code analysis tools to document the results of the analysis.

Examine

[SELECT FROM: System and services acquisition policy; system and services acquisition procedures; procedures addressing system developer security testing; procedures addressing flaw remediation; solicitation documentation; acquisition documentation; service level agreements; acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service; security and privacy architecture; system design documentation; system developer security and privacy assessment plans; results of system developer security and privacy assessments; security flaw and remediation tracking records; system security plan; privacy plan; privacy impact assessment; privacy risk assessment documentation; other relevant documents or records].

Interview

[SELECT FROM: Organizational personnel with system and service acquisition responsibilities; organizational personnel with information security responsibilities; organizational personnel with developer security and privacy testing responsibilities; organizational personnel with configuration management responsibilities; system developers].

Test

[SELECT FROM: Organizational processes for monitoring developer security testing and evaluation; mechanisms supporting and/or implementing the monitoring of developer security testing and evaluation; static code analysis tools].

Overlays

Showing the OT/ICS overlay for the parent control SA-11 — see the SA-11(1) entries within each baseline below.

OT/ICS Overlay SP 800-82r3

NIST SP 800-82r3 Appendix F, Table 22. Blank baseline means the control/control enhancement is not selected in that initial OT baseline.

LOW

Not applicable at this tier.

MODERATE

  • Base control: Included (matches standard baseline)

HIGH

  • Base control: Included (matches standard baseline)

STIGs & CCIs

No STIG checks or CCI mappings are currently loaded for SA-11(1). This section is architected to display, per product: STIG ID, Finding ID, Severity, Title, Description, Check, Fix, CCI, and NIST control mapping — but nothing is populated here until a real DISA STIG/CCI dataset is ingested.

Learn more about STIG/CCI integration →

Evidence

Potential Evidence — Derived

Categorized from the SP 800-53A "Examine"/"Test" artifact list above by keyword — not an authoritative NIST evidence list.

Policy

  • System and services acquisition policy
  • system security plan
  • privacy plan

Configuration

  • security and privacy architecture
  • system design documentation

Testing

  • Organizational processes for monitoring developer security testing and evaluation
  • mechanisms supporting and/or implementing the monitoring of developer security testing and evaluation
  • static code analysis tools

Other Records

  • system and services acquisition procedures
  • procedures addressing system developer security testing
  • procedures addressing flaw remediation
  • solicitation documentation
  • acquisition documentation
  • service level agreements
  • acquisition contracts for the system, system component, or system service
  • system developer security and privacy assessment plans
  • results of system developer security and privacy assessments
  • security flaw and remediation tracking records
  • privacy impact assessment
  • privacy risk assessment documentation
  • other relevant documents or records